✔ Emsculpt Treatment Page Update
Completed by Kamie A.
- Assigned to
-
Brittany R.
Kamie A.
- Notes
-
Hey Brittany, since this is a new client could you please edit this page for me? You can load up SEO surfer with it on google docs. I got it up to a 76 finally! once you're finished let Jonnamae know so you can update the page. Thanks!!
Link to google doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NgZ8xUy9KCq0Nfml3wYt61PYYbFO1Wh1CwTBH7B5Ssw/edit?usp=sharing
All of our treatment page examples say this same thing with links to the publications on the original device.
I know it isn't the big draw to Emsculpt, that is specifically muscle building/strengthening/definition but it does reduce a portion of fat cells in the treatment area? But only about a 19-20-ish%? Whereas Emsculpt NEO has an average 30% reduction in fat due to the addition of the Radiofrequency energy.
In this case- give the client what she wants. Client is very particular and not open to feedback. It happens.
Here's something Medstar learned when advertising Emsculpt ( regular or NEO)
More people are drawn to the fat blasting effect- before the muscle building effect. More people have fat to lose than muscle to build. It's a statistics thing. You are NOT wrong for emphasizing the fat burning aspect. We even switched ads to highlight more of the fat aspect then muscle aspect- and we saw clicks SHOOT up. It's marketing, baby!
However, just THIS time- give the client what they want and continue being an awesome writer. Don't let this case deter you from what you have been doing. The way you write and how you write it- is extremely valuable to the client's ROI.