Chris
the profound is not a laser. It is a RF microneedling device. Skin tightening is not one of its indications. Are they sure they want me to write a skin tightening page? why not a microneedling page instead?
"Microneedling gets more than 10x the search volume compared to "skin tightening."
Notified 2 people
Chris Zelig
whitney.zelig@gmail.com
email the doc
Notified 2 people
whitney.zelig@gmail.com
sent email to doc.
Notified 2 people
whitney.zelig@gmail.com
Melissa
email from doc:
yes that’s correct it’s not a laser it is an RF Microneedling device. The problem with microneedling is that is something like a $400 skin pen treatment. Profound is used to lift and tighten skin. It is the only device proven to increase elastin production at 5%. It also can be used to reduce cellulite and tighten loose skin around the body. These treatments average $4500. That’s why I am concerned about just calling it microneedling. We should already have a page for mechanical microneedling featuring the skin pen, prp ie the “vampire facial “ which is trademarked.
Melissa Z.
"Microneedling gets more than 10x the search volume compared to "skin tightening."
yes that’s correct it’s not a laser it is an RF Microneedling device. The problem with microneedling is that is something like a $400 skin pen treatment. Profound is used to lift and tighten skin. It is the only device proven to increase elastin production at 5%. It also can be used to reduce cellulite and tighten loose skin around the body. These treatments average $4500. That’s why I am concerned about just calling it microneedling. We should already have a page for mechanical microneedling featuring the skin pen, prp ie the “vampire facial “ which is trademarked.